![]() I'm not worried at all that a few more development and reception sources can be found, eg as rated C-class, it can be developed but no significant issues on notability as such. I suggested this back on a previous AFD for something, and Sabre took it to the natural extent the recent thread on WT:VG suggests going forward with it. Randomran ( talk) 21:44, 29 September 2008 (UTC) Reply Signing support for the article and bold merge. I'd go so far as to say this is a decent little article. There's some decent critical coverage for several of the locations from reliable secondary sources. Sabre ( talk) 21:23, 29 September 2008 (UTC) Reply I just want to voice my support for this merge, and commend Sabre for spearheading the effort. Referencing isn't all done, and I think we could get away with one more image under WP:NFCC for showing the rural stuff in Episode Two, but Masem reckons that the article's notability is solidified enough for the merge to take place. I've linked to the appropriate category on that Wiki in the external links. Note that just as was the case with Vortigaunt when I rewrote that, the previous forms of the articles exist in very similar (and in some cases identical) transwikied forms over on Combine OverWiki, where that sort of content is welcomed. ![]() Consequently, the have been merged here for collective notability, as none of the locations have enough significant coverage in reliable, secondary sources to warrant full spin-out articles. The previous articles suffered problems with notability, original research, lack of referencing, little other than plot summaries and and a heck of a lot that doesn't make sense if you haven't played the game. This bold merge has been undertaken to bring the locations of Half-Life into line with Wikipedia policy.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |